Richard Warner, Senior Tax Manager, was recently asked to participate in the Orange County Business Journal’s special report on “Accounting and Management Consulting.” In the Q&A section, Richard addressed the topic of “Business Owners Consider Fleeing State’s High Taxes.”
Excerpt: “Excessive taxes in California have routinely been viewed by high income residents simply as the price paid to enjoy our great year-round weather and sandy beaches. While some consideration has been given in the past toward establishing residency elsewhere, the actual exiting of the state to avoid the onerous tax laws was usually not acted upon. This view is giving way to business owners aggressively approaching ways to reduce taxes by leaving California permanently. Our firm has had many discussions and performed various analyses in the last few years for clients who ultimately left the state or are seriously considering doing so — soon. The recent cap on state tax deductions under tax reform was the last straw.”
A recent survey by GOBankingRates was done to uncover the best financial advice respondents learned from their dads growing up. The survey asked: What’s the best money advice you learned from your dad?
The responses — in order of most selected — were:
- Don’t spend money you don’t have. (34.4 percent)
- Pay your bills on time. (20.1 percent)
- Save for a rainy day. (18.5 percent)
- Don’t quit your job before you have another. (17.7 percent)
- No risk, no reward. Invest! (9.3 percent)
This study could shed light on how major financial crises in the fathers’ generations affected the way their children approach money management. Here are some excerpts from the survey analysis, focusing on Generations Y and Z (read the full survey results for analysis of other generations):
Studies have shown Gen Y is the best generation when it comes to saving money; the survey found that millennials also heeded their fathers’ advice about spending money. Gen Y participants were more likely than any other age bracket to select “don’t spend money you don’t have” as their fathers’ best money advice, at 32.2 percent.
Why? Millennials are the children of baby boomers — and, like their grandparents, weathered hard financial times in formative years. As Gen Y graduated college and entered the job market, the Great Recession was in full force; it’s no wonder millennials have learned to live within their means.
Generation Z is composed of young children, adolescents and teens on the cusp of entering adulthood. Many in this bracket are still counting on their parents’ financial support and have years ahead to map out their finances.
It comes as no surprise that more of these financially adventurous (yet parent-reliant) 18- to 24-year-old people have taken to heart their fathers’ money advice of, “No risk, no reward. Invest!,” at 14.8 percent, versus just 3.5 percent of respondents age 65 and older.
After all, as the youngest generation polled, members of Gen Z have the most time to take risks before starting to think seriously about retirement.
Editor’s note: Ryan Nguyen, CPA, Senior Forensic Manager, and Gina Lara, MBA, CFP ®, Tax and Forensic Accounting Manager, recently wrote an article for the Orange County Business Journal in the “Intellectual Property” special supplement. The article is reprinted below, which we think will be of use to our clients and business contacts. Please let us know of your feedback!
In litigation support, win or lose isn’t as important as by how much. This point is becoming especially significant in intellectual property disputes, where the median damages award in patent litigation increased more than 65% over prior year to $10.2 million in 2017. Here are some examples of what we have seen.
Recently, we were engaged by Defendant’s counsel to provide calculations related to a company that imported and sold purportedly “knock-off” designer apparel. Plaintiff sued the company in Federal Court alleging copyright, trademark, and trade dress infringement. Defendant was found liable for damages arising from three years of sales activity. Since the company maintained poor accounting records, Smith Dickson’s work involved reconstructing records from handwritten notes, testing the accuracy of the information, identifying sales data and deductible incremental costs, and determining the unjust enrichment of Defendant. Our testifying expert’s opinion of the economic damages ultimately reduced the company’s damage payments by over $14 million.
On another matter, we were hired to provide forensic analysis for a client who sold and repaired electronic equipment for the quick-service restaurant industry. Our client was sued in Federal Court by the largest industry manufacturer alleging trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, and unfair competition for falsely representing themselves as being affiliated with Plaintiff. Defendant was found guilty, but our work was critical in rebutting Plaintiff’s expert and minimizing, by several million dollars, the net profits identified by Plaintiff as disgorged by Defendant.
In an automotive industry lawsuit, we were asked to handle a case where a client registered a domain name similar to Plaintiff’s. The domain name allegedly redirected traffic to our client’s website for several months. Plaintiff sued for cybersquatting, trademark infringement, and unfair competition. Through analysis of the client’s web traffic and related revenues, we proved there was no discernible increase in page visits and revenues; thus, showing our client was not unjustly enriched.
Trade Secret Violations
In a theft of trade secrets case, we were retained by Plaintiff, the nation’s second largest real estate industry conglomerate, to assess economic damages arising from a former employee who took a customer list and other confidential information with him to his new employer. Our computations of Plaintiff’s profits from these customers before and after the incident revealed that our client suffered over $1 million in lost profits.
In a recent licensing dispute, we were engaged by Plaintiff who is one of the world’s largest providers of semiconductor and systems solutions for the aerospace and defense industry. The client sued for unpaid royalties from a patented photodiode they licensed to the Defendant. Smith Dickson’s expert testified that Defendant’s financial records exposed they were unjustly enriched by $5.4 million. The jury awarded our client this damages amount plus interest.
Building the Best Team
Win or lose, choosing the right CPAs for litigation support can be a multi-million-dollar decision. Smith Dickson, an Accountancy Corporation, has decades of litigation support experience in matters involving intellectual property, including trademark, trade secrets, licensing, patent and copyright disputes. Our work includes analyzing financial information, evaluating claims, calculating damages, preparing expert reports, and rendering expert testimony.
Ryan Nguyen, CPA, and Gina Lara, MBA, CFP ® are part of the litigation support services team at Smith Dickson, An Accountancy Corporation, based in Irvine. Ph. 949.553.1020, www.smithdickson.com.